Capability with a chain of command

Agents that work inside the rules.

YumaOS agents use 89 registered tools across the real product surface. Reads and writes carry an authenticated actor, consequential work enters a queued approval path, and every applied write is audited.

An agent action, end to endAuthority travels with the work.
  1. A person gives a briefAuthenticated user context
  2. An agent chooses a toolRead or write capability
  3. Policy checks the actionApply, queue or stop
  4. A human owns consequenceDecision and audit record

Why the tool registry matters

The agent uses the product, not a copy of it.

The registry contains 44 read-only tools and 45 write tools. The same operations support the interface and the agents, so an agent can read a board, prepare an estimate or draft a quote through established business logic.

Actor enforced

A missing request-context actor fails closed. Write capability is checked separately.

Memory follows the user

Working and observational memory can persist across agents and supported channels.

Typed output

Charts, tables and metrics are validated data rendered by trusted components, not model-written markup.

Approval without stopping the whole brief

Most consequential actions queue an intent and let the agent continue. A person can review the proposed change later, while actions that reach a customer, third party or public audience still stop and wait.

PreparedAgent proposes an action
PendingPolicy holds the consequence
DecidedA person approves or declines
RecordedThe audit trail keeps the outcome

A boundary designed in

There is no send tool.

An agent can draft a campaign, build a segment, design a template or prepare a social post. It cannot send a campaign or publish an unapproved post through the registry. Human approval remains a real transition.

YumaOS also publishes and consumes Model Context Protocol connections. Server access defaults to read-only; writes require explicit opt-in and external tools receive the same actor enforcement.

Review the security model